From: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] irq latency and tcg
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:30:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb8d4f70912070530x34cee9a2m190373c39162e048@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Can it be that qemu (-system-sparc in my case, but I guess it's more
or less similar on all platforms) reacts to irqs slower than a real
hardware due to tcg optimizations?
I see one test pattern which fails on qemu:
<cause an interrupt>
nop * N
<check whether the interrupt happened>
What I observe is that the proper interrupt does take a place, but
after the check, so no-one expects it anymore.
Is there a way to reduce the interrupt latency? Or maybe there is a
good substitute to a nop*N, so that irq would definitely get through
in the mean time?
Artyom
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-07 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 13:30 Artyom Tarasenko [this message]
2009-12-07 15:06 ` [Qemu-devel] irq latency and tcg Paul Brook
2009-12-07 17:39 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-07 17:44 ` Paul Brook
2009-12-07 18:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2009-12-09 12:30 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2009-12-12 8:46 ` Blue Swirl
2009-12-12 23:29 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb8d4f70912070530x34cee9a2m190373c39162e048@mail.gmail.com \
--to=atar4qemu@googlemail.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).