From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSfKG-0006Xh-Lg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:30:04 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NSfKC-0006Vf-PJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:30:04 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56608 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSfKC-0006VZ-KI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:30:00 -0500
Received: from mail-gx0-f212.google.com ([209.85.217.212]:43054)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>) id 1NSfKB-0000ZQ-FZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:29:59 -0500
Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so18221986gxk.17
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:29:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5581001060936t2a61a2a5n7d5618aa74881e35@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100105231558.6526.44483.stgit@skyserv>
	<20100105231933.6526.79032.stgit@skyserv>
	<f43fc5581001060936t2a61a2a5n7d5618aa74881e35@mail.gmail.com>
From: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:29:37 +0100
Message-ID: <fb8d4f71001061529q6d60f992nd68134a17cdcb871@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] sparc64: clear exception_index with -1
	value
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

What's the effect of the patch? Don't we need it for sparc32 too? The
code looks similar.

2010/1/6 Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>:
> Thanks, applied.
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
> <igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Igor V. Kovalenko <igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor V. Kovalenko <igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> =A0target-sparc/op_helper.c | =A0 =A02 +-
>> =A01 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-sparc/op_helper.c b/target-sparc/op_helper.c
>> index b1978cb..94f1c7a 100644
>> --- a/target-sparc/op_helper.c
>> +++ b/target-sparc/op_helper.c
>> @@ -3535,7 +3535,7 @@ void do_interrupt(CPUState *env)
>> =A0 =A0 env->tbr |=3D ((env->tl > 1) ? 1 << 14 : 0) | (intno << 5);
>> =A0 =A0 env->pc =3D env->tbr;
>> =A0 =A0 env->npc =3D env->pc + 4;
>> - =A0 =A0env->exception_index =3D 0;
>> + =A0 =A0env->exception_index =3D -1;
>> =A0}
>> =A0#else
>> =A0#ifdef DEBUG_PCALL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



--=20
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/