From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NujFD-00075A-3g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:20:51 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47773 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NujFB-000742-HH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:20:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NujF9-0007Gl-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:20:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:47395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NujF9-0007GX-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:20:47 -0400 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so677019wwb.4 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:20:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201003241534.01219.rob@landley.net> References: <201003241534.01219.rob@landley.net> From: Artyom Tarasenko Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:20:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Rob Landley Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org 2010/3/24 Rob Landley : > I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a= line > of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host monitoring > qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qemu). > > In the most recent release version, it never came close to triggering on = mips > with a 30 second timeout. =A0In the current -git version (well, as of Thu= rsday > anyway), it triggers frequently (about 90% of the time) even with a 60 se= cond > timeout. Are other platforms affected as well? Do your automated tests run against qemu-sparc meanwhile? --=20 Regards, Artyom Tarasenko solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/