From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/18] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:54:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbc62b05-5ac2-4fdf-840b-31e09855c62a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304114231.23493-13-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 04.03.20 12:42, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For protected guests the IPIB is written/read to/from the satellite
> block, so we need those accesses to go through
> s390_cpu_pv_mem_read/write().
Maybe mention SIDAD instead if "satellite block", similar to the other
patch descriptions.
[...]
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + if (!env->pv) {
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + }
>
> if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
> !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && !s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb))) {
> @@ -136,7 +146,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> out:
> g_free(iplb);
> - return;
> + break;
Why that change? Unrelated?
> case DIAG308_STORE:
> case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
> if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
> @@ -147,12 +157,18 @@ out:
> } else {
> iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> }
> - if (iplb) {
> - cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> - env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> - } else {
> + if (!iplb) {
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
> + return;
> }
> +
> + if (!env->pv) {
> + cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + }
> +
> + env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
> break;
> case DIAG308_PV_START:
> iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
>
I really do wonder if you should squash in patch #2 and leave it in this
position of the series.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 11:42 [PATCH v6 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 12:04 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:24 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-06 9:59 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 14:39 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:10 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:20 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:24 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 13:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 14:15 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-06 11:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-06 13:36 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:16 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 12:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:23 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:27 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:34 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:54 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 17:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 11:26 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 11:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:55 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-05 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 9:59 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 18:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-06 10:14 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-06 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 19:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 9:51 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] pc-bios: s390x: Save iplb location in lowcore Janosch Frank
2020-03-04 12:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 13:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 13:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-05 17:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] s390x: Protected Virtualization support David Hildenbrand
2020-03-04 17:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbc62b05-5ac2-4fdf-840b-31e09855c62a@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).