From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: wei@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
zhaoshenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/virt: Add virt-3.0 machine type
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:56:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbd7ea65-8f3e-bda3-1bb6-09b3b67d2543@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33a3fa10-bf1a-45cd-73bd-403cbd8d4792@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
On 06/14/18 08:27, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> On 06/13/2018 11:05 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/13/18 10:48, Eric Auger wrote:
>>
>>> PATCH: merge of ECAM and VCPU extension
>>> - Laszlo reviewed the ECAM changes but I dropped his R-b
>>> due to the squash
>>
>> Was there any particular reason why the previous patch set (with only
>> the ECAM enlargement) couldn't be merged first? To be honest I'm not
>> super happy when my R-b is dropped for non-technical reasons; it seems
>> like wasted work for both of us.
>>
>> Obviously if there's a technical dependency or some other reason why
>> committing the ECAM enlargement in separation would be *wrong*, that's
>> different. Even in that case, wouldn't it be possible to keep the
>> initial virt-3.0 machtype addition as I reviewed it, and then add the
>> rest in an incremental patch?
>
> Sorry about that. My fear was about migration. We would have had 2 virt
> 3.0 machine models not supporting the same features. While bisecting
> migration we could have had the source using the high mem ECAM and the
> destination not supporting it. So I preferred to avoid this trouble by
> merging the 2 features in one patch. However I may have kept your R-b
> restricting its scope to the ECAM stuff.
to my understanding, it is normal to *gradually* add new properties
during the development cycle, to the new machine type of the upcoming
QEMU release. To my understanding, it's not expected that migration work
between development snapshots built from git. What matters is that two
official releases, specifying the same machine type, enable the user to
migrate a guest between them (in forward direction).
In every release, so many new features are introduced that it's
impossible to introduce the new machine type with all the compat knobs
added at once. Instead, the new machine type is introduced when the
first feature that requires a compat knob is added to git. All other
such features extend the compat knobs gradually, during the development
cycle. Until the new official release is made (which contains all the
compat knobs for all the new features), the new machine type simply
doesn't exist, as far as the public is concerned, so it cannot partake
in migration either.
This is my understanding anyway.
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-13 8:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] KVM/ARM: virt-3.0: Multiple redistributor regions and 256MB ECAM region Eric Auger
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] linux-headers: Update to 4.18-rc0 Eric Auger
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] target/arm: Allow KVM device address overwriting Eric Auger
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Introduce redist-region-count array property Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:32 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-14 13:55 ` Auger Eric
2018-06-14 14:06 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm: Get prepared to handle multiple redist regions Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:39 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-14 13:48 ` Auger Eric
2018-06-14 14:03 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] hw/arm/virt: GICv3 DT node with one or two redistributor regions Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:21 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Advertise one or two GICR structures Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] hw/arm/virt: Register two redistributor regions when necessary Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:45 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] hw/arm/virt: Add a new 256MB ECAM region Eric Auger
2018-06-14 13:53 ` Andrew Jones
2018-06-13 8:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/virt: Add virt-3.0 machine type Eric Auger
2018-06-13 21:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-06-14 6:27 ` Auger Eric
2018-06-14 8:56 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-06-14 8:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-14 9:04 ` Auger Eric
2018-06-14 9:03 ` Auger Eric
2018-06-14 14:17 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbd7ea65-8f3e-bda3-1bb6-09b3b67d2543@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).