Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 28.04.21 21:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The function cannot fail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>   linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 14 +++-----------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
> index 1dfca71fa9..e455a9818d 100644
> --- a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
> @@ -230,10 +230,8 @@ give_sigsegv:
>       force_sigsegv(sig);
>   }
>   
> -static int
> -restore_sigregs(CPUS390XState *env, target_sigregs *sc)
> +static void restore_sigregs(CPUS390XState *env, target_sigregs *sc)
>   {
> -    int err = 0;
>       int i;
>   
>       for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> @@ -251,8 +249,6 @@ restore_sigregs(CPUS390XState *env, target_sigregs *sc)
>       for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>           __get_user(*get_freg(env, i), &sc->fpregs.fprs[i]);
>       }
> -
> -    return err;
>   }
>   
>   long do_sigreturn(CPUS390XState *env)
> @@ -271,9 +267,7 @@ long do_sigreturn(CPUS390XState *env)
>       target_to_host_sigset_internal(&set, &target_set);
>       set_sigmask(&set); /* ~_BLOCKABLE? */
>   
> -    if (restore_sigregs(env, &frame->sregs)) {
> -        goto badframe;
> -    }
> +    restore_sigregs(env, &frame->sregs);
>   
>       unlock_user_struct(frame, frame_addr, 0);
>       return -TARGET_QEMU_ESIGRETURN;
> @@ -297,9 +291,7 @@ long do_rt_sigreturn(CPUS390XState *env)
>   
>       set_sigmask(&set); /* ~_BLOCKABLE? */
>   
> -    if (restore_sigregs(env, &frame->uc.tuc_mcontext)) {
> -        goto badframe;
> -    }
> +    restore_sigregs(env, &frame->uc.tuc_mcontext);
>   
>       target_restore_altstack(&frame->uc.tuc_stack, env);
>   
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb