Re: [PATCH v5 03/31] exec: Use uintptr_t for guest_base

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>]

On 2/3/21 7:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> This is more descriptive than 'unsigned long'.
> No functional change, since these match on all linux+bsd hosts.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/exec/cpu-all.h | 2 +-
>  bsd-user/main.c        | 4 ++--
>  linux-user/elfload.c   | 4 ++--
>  linux-user/main.c      | 4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-all.h b/include/exec/cpu-all.h
> index c23c77589b..c52180e8e6 100644
> --- a/include/exec/cpu-all.h
> +++ b/include/exec/cpu-all.h
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static inline void tswap64s(uint64_t *s)
>  /* On some host systems the guest address space is reserved on the host.
>   * This allows the guest address space to be offset to a convenient location.
>   */
> -extern unsigned long guest_base;
> +extern uintptr_t guest_base;
>  extern bool have_guest_base;
>  extern unsigned long reserved_va;
>  
> diff --git a/bsd-user/main.c b/bsd-user/main.c
> index 65163e1396..c09d74d788 100644
> --- a/bsd-user/main.c
> +++ b/bsd-user/main.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>  
>  int singlestep;
>  unsigned long mmap_min_addr;
> -unsigned long guest_base;
> +uintptr_t guest_base;
>  bool have_guest_base;
>  unsigned long reserved_va;
>  
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>      g_free(target_environ);
>  
>      if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_PAGE)) {
> -        qemu_log("guest_base  0x%lx\n", guest_base);
> +        qemu_log("guest_base  %p\n", (void *)guest_base);

Why not use PRIxPTR?

Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>