From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvN8i-00012V-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvN8g-00012J-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41592 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JvN8g-00012G-3R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:42 -0400 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.156]:47768) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JvN8f-0007KX-RJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:41 -0400 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1194367ywa.82 for ; Sun, 11 May 2008 18:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:40 +0900 From: "Jun Koi" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vgabios vs. vgabios-cirrus? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:49 PM, C. W. Betts wrote: > I think the reason why we have two VGA BIOSes is because one is for the > original, non-cirrus VGA card, while the other one is for the Cirrus card. > The latter is used by default on I386. But this still doesnt answer my question: what is the difference between these two BIOS, and why I should use one but not the other. Many thanks, Jun > On May 8, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jun Koi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently we have 2 vgabios: vgabios.bin and vgabios-cirrus.bin. Is >> there any difference between them? Does one offer more features than >> the other, or what? >> >> I imagine that we have 2 vgabios because some OS prefers one to the >> other, but cannot confirm that. >> >> Many thanks, >> Jun >> >> > > > > > >