From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NK0H6-0008UN-Az for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:03:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NK0H1-0008R6-9H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:02:59 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43793 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NK0H1-0008Qt-3E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:02:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f188.google.com ([209.85.222.188]:45113) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NK0Gz-00075L-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:02:54 -0500 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so1762158pzk.4 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:02:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jun Koi Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:00:54 +0900 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Qemu-devel] TCGv_i64 type? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I found that in tcg/tcg.h, we have following definitions: typedef int TCGv_i32; typedef int TCGv_i64; Is that correct? Why do we have the same definition for 64bit and 32 bit types? Doesnt TCGv_i64 suppose to be 64 bit? Thanks, Jun