qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] block/nvme: Use per-queue AIO context
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 23:27:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <feb25dc2-95e0-cfdf-412d-df2e89044339@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701160328.GS126613@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On 7/1/20 6:03 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:13:18PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> To be able to use multiple queues on the same hardware,
>> we need to have each queue able to receive IRQ notifications
>> in the correct AIO context.
>> The AIO context and the notification handler have to be proper
>> to each queue, not to the block driver. Move aio_context and
>> irq_notifier from BDRVNVMeState to NVMeQueuePair.
> 
> If I understand correctly, after this patch:
> 
> 1. Each queue pair has an EventNotifier irq_notifier but only the admin
>    queuepair's irq_notifier is hooked up to VFIO. This means all
>    interrupts come via the admin queuepair.

Yes, but this was the behavior before this patch too.

> 
>    (This also means all queuepairs still need to be polled for
>    completions when the interrupt fires because we don't know which
>    queuepair had a completion event.)

Yes.

> 
> 2. AioContexts must be identical across all queuepairs and
>    BlockDriverStates. Although they all have their own AioContext
>    pointer there is no true support for different AioContexts yet.

I'm not sure. Maybe v3 will sort that out.

> 
>    (For example, nvme_cmd_sync() is called with a bs argument but
>    AIO_WAIT_WHILE(q->aio_context, ...) uses the queuepair aio_context so
>    the assumption is that they match.)
> 
> Please confirm and add something equivalent into the commit description
> so the assumptions/limitations are clear.

I'll do my best!

Thanks for your reviews,

Phil.



      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-04 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 19:13 [PATCH v2 00/12] block/nvme: Various cleanups required to use multiple queues Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] block/nvme: Replace magic value by SCALE_MS definition Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 15:48   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] block/nvme: Avoid further processing if trace event not enabled Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 15:48   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] block/nvme: Let nvme_create_queue_pair() fail gracefully Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] block/nvme: Define QUEUE_INDEX macros to ease code review Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] block/nvme: Rename local variable Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 15:49   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] block/nvme: Use union of NvmeIdCtrl / NvmeIdNs structures Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 15:51   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] block/nvme: Replace qemu_try_blockalign0 by qemu_try_blockalign/memset Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] block/nvme: Replace qemu_try_blockalign(bs) by qemu_try_memalign(pg_sz) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 15:51   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] block/nvme: Simplify nvme_init_queue() arguments Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] block/nvme: Replace BDRV_POLL_WHILE by AIO_WAIT_WHILE Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] block/nvme: Simplify nvme_create_queue_pair() arguments Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-30 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] block/nvme: Use per-queue AIO context Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-01 16:03   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-04 21:27     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=feb25dc2-95e0-cfdf-412d-df2e89044339@redhat.com \
    --to=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).