qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Still more coroutine and various fixes in block layer
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:41:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fefd924d-27be-54d1-2068-e25c060e384d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116085050.2295179-1-eesposit@redhat.com>

I apologize, as discussed also in v2 I just realized I could introduce
generated_co_wrapper_simple already here and simplify patches 6 and 8.

Also I think commit messages are the old ones from v1.

I'll resend. Please ignore this serie.

Emanuele

Am 16/11/2022 um 09:50 schrieb Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito:
> This is a dump of all minor coroutine-related fixes found while looking
> around and testing various things in the QEMU block layer.
> 
> Patches aim to:
> - add missing coroutine_fn annotation to the functions
> - simplify to avoid the typical "if in coroutine: fn()
>   // else create_coroutine(fn)" already present in generated_co_wraper
>   functions.
> - make sure that if a BlockDriver callback is defined as coroutine_fn, then
>   it is always running in a coroutine.
> 
> This serie is based on Kevin Wolf's series "block: Simplify drain".
> 
> Based-on: <20221108123738.530873-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
> 
> Emanuele
> ---
> v3:
> * Remove patch 1, base on kevin "drain semplification serie"
> 
> v2:
> * clarified commit message in patches 2/3/6 on why we add coroutine_fn
> 
> Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito (8):
>   block-copy: add missing coroutine_fn annotations
>   nbd/server.c: add missing coroutine_fn annotations
>   block-backend: replace bdrv_*_above with blk_*_above
>   block: distinguish between bdrv_create running in coroutine and not
>   block/vmdk: add missing coroutine_fn annotations
>   block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn
>   block: bdrv_create is never called in coroutine context
>   block/dirty-bitmap: remove unnecessary qemu_in_coroutine() case
> 
>  block.c                            | 75 ++++++++++++++----------------
>  block/block-backend.c              | 21 +++++++++
>  block/block-copy.c                 | 15 +++---
>  block/commit.c                     |  4 +-
>  block/dirty-bitmap.c               | 66 ++++++++++++--------------
>  block/vmdk.c                       | 36 +++++++-------
>  include/block/block-global-state.h |  3 +-
>  include/sysemu/block-backend-io.h  |  9 ++++
>  nbd/server.c                       | 43 +++++++++--------
>  qemu-img.c                         |  4 +-
>  10 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
> 



      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16  8:50 [PATCH v3 0/8] Still more coroutine and various fixes in block layer Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] block-copy: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] nbd/server.c: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] block-backend: replace bdrv_*_above with blk_*_above Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] block: distinguish between bdrv_create running in coroutine and not Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] block/vmdk: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] block: bdrv_create is never called in coroutine context Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16  8:50 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] block/dirty-bitmap: remove unnecessary qemu_in_coroutine() case Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 10:41 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fefd924d-27be-54d1-2068-e25c060e384d@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).