From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3180C04E53 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD6620881 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 16:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="sHd6/etN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9DD6620881 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQx5u-00042E-Uj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:49:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQx52-0003fX-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:48:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQx50-0004j3-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:48:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]:46543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQx50-0004hp-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:48:34 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id y11so242228pfm.13 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RMGkwM3XSApYIV+P3GR3GIgyJDcH5SsU5AbBli8SMdU=; b=sHd6/etNw3t5lCoLgXlvlNUvlrN+4F2wIB9Iz6DrS2kpftsD50vyMD5GsaLNXHArqR 3Km2OXvx16LkJsE6OYEIUtxgu1C5VKs9TRSHhBa/jGOxbsqn0S7BSlEo7c29ONHb+KBC 8jyI0vad6PsKf7NlNwQh3+qGq5eIuSGP3WlG5kOzrMkyPZv7/4ZkC68GSScoF+v6waxt YhRd4UQdZW2CfM7oYziq+3vA3AxQzmXpG+5pFdaYrzvgu5N5S01sLvfwmcZT1xao6SxG +LRTB9BXzHZ+tbLsFV3gXB2v+8xlOquQf2X62OLDYQld05h/suOZRJJQHpUgY+f394kV 3c4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RMGkwM3XSApYIV+P3GR3GIgyJDcH5SsU5AbBli8SMdU=; b=YWLbS1O4HbWtET7+PE9Ui59BAikDqdl/B9yhyCmQJ6ZVlYL07l+6/OPUBctkLyQynl c1STDGFgy8nAdnwPxzH0hpRqnxW5zYkMPWrkEkqXTK7fpvClboXcJDHsZMGDEQ3luEZo /NtcUeiYdam18b7tLXhVFdmkkFPuv78x80F7jqbk6wpBhS+1YNJu6Bx5jqOPu/pGdZBl BEDjXr6C4y0D9qDCprJ1RtLdVKhSHN/YDf55fVuQ5G19+sRXRzPhY0yGMRpYUtzsfrpp HWPJ2zYcsvtxAP96yiZ4eeWE+TvSPbJa28toZjmbIHuKJnHAeQ5agfeao++KnLLjMEy3 2s4g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpfLBosOS8umi0UQKy59taFkSQU6GV7h0JqpOtm3HF1iKejHjZ P4/EPlWA7YzqW4KKqjhp4UlVzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeVj2GPe29m6QwpFOkMBWthQRk2HkwmwUgK5umkMLyaKB80/ZGBhJy0zUZhX6PKu6fExNu8w== X-Received: by 2002:a62:414a:: with SMTP id o71mr49130448pfa.240.1557938912932; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (97-113-13-231.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.13.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm3601899pfi.172.2019.05.15.09.48.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 09:48:31 -0700 (PDT) To: Yoshinori Sato , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20190514061458.125225-1-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> From: Richard Henderson Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:48:29 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190514061458.125225-1-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::444 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 00/12] Add RX archtecture support X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, philmd@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 5/13/19 11:14 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > This patch series is added Renesas RX target emulation. > > I fixed the ROM address because v11 was incorrect. > > My git repository is bellow. > git://git.pf.osdn.net/gitroot/y/ys/ysato/qemu.git tags/rx-20190514 > > Testing binaries bellow. > u-boot > Download - https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/u-boot.bin.gz > > starting > $ gzip -d u-boot.bin.gz > $ qemu-system-rx -bios u-boot.bin > > linux and pico-root (only sash) > Download - https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/zImage (kernel) > https://osdn.net/users/ysato/pf/qemu/dl/rx-qemu.dtb (DeviceTree) > > starting > $ qemu-system-rx -kernel zImage -dtb rx-qemu.dtb -append "earlycon" > > Changes for v11. > - Fix ROM address. I think this is ready to be committed, but it is difficult to tell because you have not retained the Reviewed-by: tags that have been given to previous versions. Looking at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=&submitter=7114&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= Review Tested >>From v10: 13/13 - - 12/13 1 - 11/13 - - 10/13 2 1 09/13 1 1 08/13 - 1 07/13 - - 06/13 - 1 05/13 1 - 04/13 1 1 03/13 1 - 02/13 1 - 01/13 1 1 >>From v8: 08/12 1 - 07/12 1 - 06/12 1 - In summary, only the last patch is unreviewed, and it appears that you've fixed the issue I pointed out in v11. I have now sent reviews for those. In future, please retain the tags as you go through the development process. Rather than having you send out a v13 with only changes to the tags, I will apply them myself while preparing an initial pull request for this. Thanks for your patience. r~