From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8vpq-0005Jq-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:00:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L8vpq-0005J7-1U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:00:34 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57842 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8vpp-0005Iw-Tw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:00:33 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54970 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L8vpp-0000wl-6k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:00:33 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L8vph-0006pc-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:00:25 +0000 Received: from 77-58-232-244.dclient.hispeed.ch ([77.58.232.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:00:25 +0000 Received: from thomas by 77-58-232-244.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:00:25 +0000 From: Thomas Mueller Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20081204170920.GD21175@pintsize> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: vlan option is misleading, what about vnet ? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org > > I think vlan network option is misleading because it's about a virtual > network and not 802.1Q . > > I'd like to rename it vnet (or something similar.. any ideas?) and then > mark vlan option deprecated somehow. my vote for renaming. would have saved me a lot of time once. - Thomas