From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB6vk-0003PJ-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:20:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB6vf-0003Ko-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:20:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39006 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NB6vf-0003Ke-7D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:20:07 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46768) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NB6hE-0000ie-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:05:12 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NB6h6-0001Fx-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:05:04 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com ([209.132.186.34]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:05:03 +0100 Received: from pbonzini by nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:05:03 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:01:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1258487037-24950-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/10]: QError v4 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/19/2009 11:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > But I can't see that need in your particular example. The client asks > the server to create a snapshot. The operation fails. The client > already knows what the name of the snapshot is, doesn't it? No need to > get it from the error. Yeah, I just took a random error from grep so your objection makes total sense. But is that still true when we have asynchronous notifications? Paolo