From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbWwU-0005go-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:22:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53440 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbWwT-0005gH-63 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:22:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbWwO-0005hg-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:22:09 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50192) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbWwO-0005ha-1E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:22:04 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbWwL-0006mb-Tt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:22:01 +0100 Received: from 93-34-208-53.ip51.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.208.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:22:01 +0100 Received: from pbonzini by 93-34-208-53.ip51.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:22:01 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:21:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1264547685-21129-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1264547685-21129-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4B5FA0A3.30302@codemonkey.ws> <4B60B367.9000709@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/6] fix audio_bug related failures List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/31/2010 04:08 AM, malc wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> On 01/27/2010 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> What did clang complain about? It's not obvious to me. >>> >>> It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few false >>> positive in its callers. >> >> Ah, this is a clang issue. I'll have to defer to malc on this one. > > I'm against it. Ok, I'll withdraw this patch. I already posted v2. Paolo