From: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:57:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i56o0g$b27$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C75A736.80005@codemonkey.ws>
On 08/25/2010 04:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/25/2010 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 08/25/2010 12:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2010 02:37 PM, walt wrote:
>>>> I find that qemu-kvm boots to the Win7 login prompt in 25 seconds,
>>>> while qemu with kvm enabled takes about 45 seconds.
>>> Also, what's your full command line?
>> /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 1024 -enable-kvm -cpu kvm64 w7.diff
> You'll get more accurate and repeatable results by using:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 1024 -enable-kvm -cpu kvm64 -drive file=w7.diff,cache=none
Turning off the cache slows both of them down, as I would expect:
qemu-kvm: 52 seconds
qemu: 65 seconds
> Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth trying.
Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely: both come in at about 65 seconds.
I also tried xp-32 running on the same two kvm64 virtual machines, with slightly
different results:
qemu-kvm: 35 seconds (65 seconds using -no-kvm-irqchip, a huge disadvantage)
qemu: 58 seconds
Anything unexpected in these results?
Thanks for your time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 19:37 [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? walt
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-25 23:09 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
2010-08-25 23:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 7:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26 7:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 9:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26 10:24 ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-26 10:25 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 11:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 12:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 12:57 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 21:57 ` walt [this message]
2010-08-29 15:02 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='i56o0g$b27$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=w41ter@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).