From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O78k2-0004bs-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:58 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36228 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O78jx-0004aO-Pd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O78jw-0008MV-Da for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:53 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.145]:29058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O78jw-0008MK-98 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:52 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so526981eyb.14 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:59:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] thread synchronization in qcow2.c and qcow2-cluster.c From: "Chunqiang (CQ) Tang" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote= : > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wr= ote: >> Can you double check that qemu-kvm.o is being linked in instead of kvm-a= ll.o? > > I looked again and noticed that qemu-kvm.c is included from kvm-all.c. > =A0Please ignore my question of whether qemu-kvm.c is being linked in > :). > > Perhaps you'd like to post your latest findings to the KVM mailing > list at kvm@vger.kernel.org since this is a qemu-kvm question? > > Stefan Yes, this is a qemu-kvm question. I will summarize my finding and send it to kvm@vger.kernel.org . Thank you for the answers and for informing the KVM mailing list. Regards, CQ Tang