From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] block: add eject request callback
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:46:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <j8gb1a$5t3$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAAE4A0.7090507@redhat.com>
On 10/28/2011 07:21 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> > - if (!force&& !bdrv_dev_is_tray_open(bs)
>> > -&& bdrv_dev_is_medium_locked(bs)) {
>> > - qerror_report(QERR_DEVICE_LOCKED, bdrv_get_device_name(bs));
>> > + if (bdrv_dev_is_medium_locked(bs)&& !bdrv_dev_is_tray_open(bs)) {
>> > + bdrv_dev_eject_request(bs, force);
>> > + if (!force) {
>> > + qerror_report(QERR_DEVICE_LOCKED, bdrv_get_device_name(bs));
>> > + }
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> > bdrv_close(bs);
> Now force doesn't force any more. It avoids the error message, but
> doesn't forcefully close the BlockDriverState any more. Intentional? If
> so, why is it a good idea?
In theory the guest OS should eject the disk itself. However, force
does unlock the disk so that: 1) two ejects will have the desired
effect; 2) force eject followed by change will work even with the tray
locked, unlike before this series.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-29 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 10:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] My remaining block/SCSI patches for 1.0 Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] scsi: do not call transfer_data after canceling a request Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] scsi-disk: bump SCSIRequest reference count until aio completion runs Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] scsi-generic: " Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] scsi: push request restart to SCSIDevice Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] scsi-disk: add scsi-block for device passthrough Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-28 17:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] block: add eject request callback Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-28 17:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-29 7:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-11-07 13:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-07 13:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-07 13:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-11-07 13:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-07 14:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-11-07 15:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-11-07 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-07 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8 v2] " Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-08 13:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] atapi: implement eject requests Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-25 10:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] scsi-disk: " Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-27 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] ping Re: [PATCH 0/5] My remaining block/SCSI patches for 1.0 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='j8gb1a$5t3$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).