From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKooj-0006k5-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:10:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKooi-000873-NG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:10:09 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKooi-00086I-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:10:08 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKoog-0005sI-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:10:06 +0100 Received: from 93-34-199-98.ip51.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.199.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:10:06 +0100 Received: from pbonzini by 93-34-199-98.ip51.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:10:06 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:05:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1319214405-20388-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1319214405-20388-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] qemu-timer: move common code to qemu_rearm_alarm_timer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/31/2011 08:23 AM, TeLeMan wrote: >> > static void qemu_rearm_alarm_timer(struct qemu_alarm_timer *t) >> > { >> > - if (!alarm_has_dynticks(t)) >> > + int64_t nearest_delta_ns; >> > + assert(alarm_has_dynticks(t)); > "mmtimer" and "win32" alarms have no rearm. Should we remove these two alarms? Yes. I think with iothread they are broken, or almost broken. Paolo