From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSkst-0002z8-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:35:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSksr-00053N-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:35:14 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSksr-00053H-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:35:13 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSksq-0005Gm-GQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:35:12 +0100 Received: from 93-34-207-114.ip51.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.207.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:35:12 +0100 Received: from pbonzini by 93-34-207-114.ip51.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:35:12 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:31:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4ECAC105.8040404@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4ECB01D8.1010105@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4ECB01D8.1010105@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] updating seabios to current release? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/22/2011 02:58 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Current version of seabios is 1.6.3, released several >> weeks ago. Compared with the version currently shipped >> in qemu, it adds a few commits, most of which are fixes >> for qemu-related issues. Maybe it's not too late to update >> seabios to the latest released version in order to incorporate >> all the fixes and to have nice release numbers? > > Did the off-by-one USB boot order patch make it to 1.6.3? It is not yet in git (I'll ping Kevin about it), but that patch in particular is only a few days old, not weeks. Paolo