From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41158)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S47F9-0003tg-G7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:56:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S47F7-00047U-SF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:56:39 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50823)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S47F7-00047O-LC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:56:37 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1S47F1-0002gT-HR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:56:31 +0100
Received: from 93-34-182-16.ip50.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.182.16])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:56:31 +0100
Received: from pbonzini by 93-34-182-16.ip50.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:56:31 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:56:17 +0100
Message-ID: <jivanh$612$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <73865e0ce364c40e0eb65ec6b22b819d@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F31153E.9010205@codemonkey.ws> <4F311839.9030709@redhat.com>
	<e2d5747f27ca519ddc6b7f0133e0a1a8@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F311BBA.8000708@codemonkey.ws> <4F312FD3.5020206@zerto.com>
	<4F3137DB.1040503@redhat.com> <4F3139CE.4040103@zerto.com>
	<4F314798.8010009@redhat.com> <4F3211D0.3070502@zerto.com>
	<4F323875.1000000@redhat.com> <4F3244C2.1040604@zerto.com>
	<4F32489A.80307@redhat.com> <4F32788C.60904@zerto.com>
	<CAJSP0QXRdU4XhW2wU+vOPh+vuzEECdKEWUGzaaENEtTbpRfKMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F40FBD6.2000500@zerto.com> <4F425987.20103@redhat.com>
	<4F435DD2.8080600@redhat.com> <4F4DE40C.9020001@zerto.com>
	<CAJSP0QWOd-q-W3LcV1THYy_XPTk2XPvdLth+v-B+iC22n-4HZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F52FA48.9050903@zerto.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <4F52FA48.9050903@zerto.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BlockDriverState stack and BlockListeners
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 04/03/2012 06:14, Ori Mamluk ha scritto:
> I prefer not to do it as NBD server, mainly because NBD by definition
> requires a port per volume and I think it will pose a management overhead.

NBD supports multiple volumes on the same server, just not the
implementation in QEMU.  Also you could use a different negotiation but
still the same request format, which would let you share some code.

Paolo