From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NxMid-0000PX-Vg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:54:08 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32795 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxMia-0000NW-Pz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:54:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NxMiZ-000704-8E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:54:04 -0400
Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:34110)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <blauwirbel@gmail.com>) id 1NxMiY-0006zw-Vc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:54:03 -0400
Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so1097711pwi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4BB408CF.9040004@codemonkey.ws>
References: <20100331182031.GA5200@redhat.com> <4BB393CF.1040700@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100331153805.03ee142e@redhat.com>
	<20100331190753.GA6914@redhat.com> <4BB3A183.8000905@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100331224541.GB19306@hall.aurel32.net>
	<4BB408CF.9040004@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:54:01 +0300
Message-ID: <k2gf43fc5581004010854w9cc4624azde071378580a1db9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix features ack
From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

On 4/1/10, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 05:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > While it probably make sense to achieve this goal, it doesn't mean it
> > should be done the dirty way.
> >
> > For example it is known for a lot of time that the solution for the
> > bswap in the device code is to add a bus model doing the byteswapping.
> > Removing the #ifdef by deciding "this device will only be big/little
> > endian" doesn't seem to go in the right direction.
> >
> >
>
>  Yeah, I'm having real trouble with the KVM regression.  I thought I had it
> fixed but linux-user really made a mess of things.  There's no simple
> solution that doesn't require quite a bit of refactoring which I'd rather do
> in a less ugly way.  We've already been discussing getting rid of all the
> kvm_enabled() stuff and I think doing that properly is going to be needed to
> handle this correctly.

Strange, does linux-user use kvm.h (indirectly)?