From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52595)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1TNLqW-00040U-MU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:55:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1TNLqV-00025n-St
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:55:00 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43818)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1TNLqV-00025e-MF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 06:54:59 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gceq-qemu-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1TNLqZ-0005z1-Tq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:55:03 +0200
Received: from 95.64.105.131 ([95.64.105.131])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:55:03 +0200
Received: from terminatorul by 95.64.105.131 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:55:03 +0200
From: Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:52:54 +0300
Message-ID: <k5e5ho$7b2$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Any alternative to kqemu ?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hello

Is kqemu deprecated ? Is there an alternative to it ? I mean other than 
kvm, which my CPU (Pentium Celeron D, 2.53 GHz) does not support.

Can I compile qemu with "-O3 -march=pentium" if I want to get better 
performance ? Has anyone tried it ?

`qemu-system-i386 -net nic ...` keeps saying upon invocation that vlan0 
is not connected to host network. My `vconfig add eth1` command 
completed successfully, and I can `ifconfig eth1.0`, although I see no 
IP address on the new interface, only the mac address.

I have qemu 1.2.0 compiled on Slackware 14.0.

Thank you,
Timothy Madden