From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O72Ol-0001xI-Uj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:13:35 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57883 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O72Oj-0001wB-RL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:13:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O72Oi-0003XU-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:13:33 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f209.google.com ([209.85.218.209]:36503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O72Oi-0003XG-DY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:13:32 -0400 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so17610004bwz.2 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:13:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:13:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] thread synchronization in qcow2.c and qcow2-cluster.c From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Chunqiang (CQ) Tang" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > Can you double check that qemu-kvm.o is being linked in instead of kvm-all.o? I looked again and noticed that qemu-kvm.c is included from kvm-all.c. Please ignore my question of whether qemu-kvm.c is being linked in :). Perhaps you'd like to post your latest findings to the KVM mailing list at kvm@vger.kernel.org since this is a qemu-kvm question? Stefan