From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzuYI-0007Ny-2G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:25:58 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57002 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzuWb-0006Zm-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:25:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzuVx-0006d8-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:23:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com ([209.85.221.188]:43823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzuVx-0006cj-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:23:33 -0400 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2462720qyk.19 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:23:31 +0100 Message-ID: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [GSoC 2010] Pass-through filesystem support. List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mohammed Gamal Cc: Anthony Liguori , Cam Macdonell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote: >> 1- What does the community prefer to use and improve? CIFS, 9p, or >> both? And which is better taken up for GSoC. There have been recent patches for filesystem passthrough using 9P: http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg28100.html You might want to consider them if you haven't seen them already. Stefan