From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Support protection keys in an AMD EPYC-Milan VM
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:32:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21r8h3eko.fsf@dme.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31dce00c-71bf-6d30-a1d2-f0b6ce743db2@amd.com>
On Thursday, 2021-07-01 at 16:24:51 -05, Babu Moger wrote:
> David, Are you still working on v2 of these series? I was going to test
> and review. Thanks
Yes. I have something that works, but it's messy in places. I hope to
get it out in a couple of days.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 3:25 AM
>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>; Paolo
>> Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>;
>> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; Moger, Babu
>> <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Support protection keys in an AMD EPYC-Milan
>> VM
>>
>> On Thursday, 2021-05-20 at 15:56:40 +01, David Edmondson wrote:
>>
>> > AMD EPYC-Milan CPUs introduced support for protection keys, previously
>> > available only with Intel CPUs.
>> >
>> > AMD chose to place the XSAVE state component for the protection keys
>> > at a different offset in the XSAVE state area than that chosen by
>> > Intel.
>> >
>> > To accommodate this, modify QEMU to behave appropriately on AMD
>> > systems, allowing a VM to properly take advantage of the new feature.
>> >
>> > Further, avoid manipulating XSAVE state components that are not
>> > present on AMD systems.
>> >
>> > The code in patch 6 that changes the CPUID 0x0d leaf is mostly dumped
>> > somewhere that seemed to work - I'm not sure where it really belongs.
>>
>> Ping - any thoughts about this approach?
>>
>> > David Edmondson (7):
>> > target/i386: Declare constants for XSAVE offsets
>> > target/i386: Use constants for XSAVE offsets
>> > target/i386: Clarify the padding requirements of X86XSaveArea
>> > target/i386: Prepare for per-vendor X86XSaveArea layout
>> > target/i386: Introduce AMD X86XSaveArea sub-union
>> > target/i386: Adjust AMD XSAVE PKRU area offset in CPUID leaf 0xd
>> > target/i386: Manipulate only AMD XSAVE state on AMD
>> >
>> > target/i386/cpu.c | 19 +++++----
>> > target/i386/cpu.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> > target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 57 +++++++++----------------
>> > target/i386/tcg/fpu_helper.c | 20 ++++++---
>> > target/i386/xsave_helper.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>> > 5 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.30.2
>>
>> dme.
>> --
>> You know your green from your red.
dme.
--
When you were the brightest star, who were the shadows?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 14:56 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Support protection keys in an AMD EPYC-Milan VM David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] target/i386: Declare constants for XSAVE offsets David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] target/i386: Use " David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] target/i386: Clarify the padding requirements of X86XSaveArea David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] target/i386: Prepare for per-vendor X86XSaveArea layout David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] target/i386: Introduce AMD X86XSaveArea sub-union David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] target/i386: Adjust AMD XSAVE PKRU area offset in CPUID leaf 0xd David Edmondson
2021-05-20 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] target/i386: Manipulate only AMD XSAVE state on AMD David Edmondson
2021-05-20 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Support protection keys in an AMD EPYC-Milan VM no-reply
2021-06-08 8:24 ` David Edmondson
2021-07-01 21:24 ` Babu Moger
2021-07-01 21:32 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-06-11 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-14 16:21 ` David Edmondson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m21r8h3eko.fsf@dme.org \
--to=dme@dme.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).