From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:19:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21rcdej7b.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317180013.235231-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Wednesday, 2021-03-17 at 19:00:12 +01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Test that rwlock upgrade is fair, and readers go back to sleep if a writer
> is in line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> ---
> tests/unit/test-coroutine.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c b/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> index e946d93a65..6e6f51d480 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,67 @@ static void test_co_mutex_lockable(void)
> g_assert(QEMU_MAKE_LOCKABLE(null_pointer) == NULL);
> }
>
> +static CoRwlock rwlock;
> +
> +/* Test that readers are properly sent back to the queue when upgrading,
> + * even if they are the sole readers. The test scenario is as follows:
> + *
> + *
> + * | c1 | c2 |
> + * |--------------+------------+
> + * | rdlock | |
> + * | yield | |
> + * | | wrlock |
> + * | | <queued> |
> + * | upgrade | |
> + * | <queued> | <dequeued> |
> + * | | unlock |
> + * | <dequeued> | |
> + * | unlock | |
> + */
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn rwlock_yield_upgrade(void *opaque)
> +{
> + qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_upgrade(&rwlock);
> + qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&rwlock);
> +
> + *(bool *)opaque = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn rwlock_wrlock_yield(void *opaque)
> +{
> + qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock(&rwlock);
> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&rwlock);
> + *(bool *)opaque = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_co_rwlock_upgrade(void)
> +{
> + bool c1_done = false;
> + bool c2_done = false;
> + Coroutine *c1, *c2;
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_init(&rwlock);
> + c1 = qemu_coroutine_create(rwlock_yield_upgrade, &c1_done);
> + c2 = qemu_coroutine_create(rwlock_wrlock_yield, &c2_done);
> +
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c1);
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c2);
> +
> + /* c1 now should go to sleep. */
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c1);
> + g_assert(!c1_done);
> +
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c2);
> + g_assert(c1_done);
> + g_assert(c2_done);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check that creation, enter, and return work
> */
> @@ -501,6 +562,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> g_test_add_func("/basic/order", test_order);
> g_test_add_func("/locking/co-mutex", test_co_mutex);
> g_test_add_func("/locking/co-mutex/lockable", test_co_mutex_lockable);
> + g_test_add_func("/locking/co-rwlock/upgrade", test_co_rwlock_upgrade);
> if (g_test_perf()) {
> g_test_add_func("/perf/lifecycle", perf_lifecycle);
> g_test_add_func("/perf/nesting", perf_nesting);
> --
> 2.29.2
dme.
--
Don't you know you're never going to get to France.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 18:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] coroutine-lock: reimplement CoRwlock to fix downgrade bug Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 16:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:19 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] test-coroutine: Add rwlock downgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Max Reitz
2021-03-24 16:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17 12:16 [PATCH v4 " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 15:19 ` David Edmondson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m21rcdej7b.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).