From: MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@gmail.com>
To: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:11:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m24nevkp2f.wl%morita.kazutaka@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5178AD4A.6050306@gmail.com>
At Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:12:58 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On 04/25/2013 12:47 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > - don't break old behavior if we boot up on the snapshot by using s->reverted
> > to indicate if we delete working VDI successfully
>
> If we implement 'boot from snapshot' == loadvm snapshot, we don't need
> s->reverted. What do you think, Kazutaka? With this idea, qemu -hda
> sheepdog:test:id will be virtually the same as qemu -hda sheepdog:test
> -loadvm id.
>
> I don't understand the usecase for snapshting current workding VDI and
> then restore to the specified snapshot.
Are you suggesting that booting from snapshot should discard the
current state like savevm? If yes, it looks okay to me.
Thanks,
Kazutaka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 16:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 4:12 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 8:11 ` MORITA Kazutaka [this message]
2013-04-25 8:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 9:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 9:44 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 10:03 ` MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 12:32 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 13:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-26 9:04 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-26 11:48 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m24nevkp2f.wl%morita.kazutaka@gmail.com \
--to=morita.kazutaka@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).