From: Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Alexander Bulekov" <alxndr@bu.edu>,
"Bandan Das" <bsd@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-6.1 v6] fuzz: add an instrumentation filter
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:37:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m28s2av6sw.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709200845.22610-1-alxndr@bu.edu>
On Friday, 2021-07-09 at 16:08:44 -04, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> By default, -fsanitize=fuzzer instruments all code with coverage
> information. However, this means that libfuzzer will track coverage over
> hundreds of source files that are unrelated to virtual-devices. This
> means that libfuzzer will optimize inputs for coverage observed in timer
> code, memory APIs etc. This slows down the fuzzer and stores many inputs
> that are not relevant to the actual virtual-devices.
>
> With this change, clang versions that support the
> "-fsanitize-coverage-allowlist" will only instrument a subset of the
> compiled code, that is directly related to virtual-devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>
> ---
>
> Hi,
> Resending this one, as this did not work with the OSS-Fuzz containers.
> (The instrumentation filter support was only checked/applied when
> LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE was not set). I had to shift a couple things around
> in the configure script, since this was last reviewed.
> Thank you
>
> configure | 28 +++++++++++++++----
> .../oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template | 15 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 scripts/oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index e799d908a3..99d6182af9 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -4943,13 +4943,21 @@ fi
>
> ##########################################
> # checks for fuzzer
> -if test "$fuzzing" = "yes" && test -z "${LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE+xxx}"; then
> +if test "$fuzzing" = "yes" ; then
> write_c_fuzzer_skeleton
> - if compile_prog "$CPU_CFLAGS -Werror -fsanitize=fuzzer" ""; then
> - have_fuzzer=yes
> - else
> - error_exit "Your compiler doesn't support -fsanitize=fuzzer"
> - exit 1
> + if test -z "${LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE+xxx}"; then
> + if compile_prog "$CPU_CFLAGS -Werror -fsanitize=fuzzer" ""; then
> + have_fuzzer=yes
> + else
> + error_exit "Your compiler doesn't support -fsanitize=fuzzer"
> + exit 1
> + fi
> + fi
> +
> + have_clang_coverage_filter=no
> + echo > $TMPTXT
> + if compile_prog "$CPU_CFLAGS -Werror -fsanitize=fuzzer -fsanitize-coverage-allowlist=$TMPTXT" ""; then
> + have_clang_coverage_filter=yes
> fi
> fi
>
> @@ -5843,6 +5851,14 @@ if test "$fuzzing" = "yes" ; then
> else
> FUZZ_EXE_LDFLAGS="$LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE"
> fi
> +
> + # Specify a filter to only instrument code that is directly related to
> + # virtual-devices.
> + if test "$have_clang_coverage_filter" = "yes" ; then
> + cp "$source_path/scripts/oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template" \
> + instrumentation-filter
> + QEMU_CFLAGS="$QEMU_CFLAGS -fsanitize-coverage-allowlist=instrumentation-filter"
> + fi
> fi
>
> if test "$plugins" = "yes" ; then
> diff --git a/scripts/oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template b/scripts/oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..76d2b6139a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/oss-fuzz/instrumentation-filter-template
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +# Code that we actually want the fuzzer to target
> +# See: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#disabling-instrumentation-without-source-modification
> +#
> +src:*/hw/*
> +src:*/include/hw/*
> +src:*/slirp/*
> +src:*/net/*
> +
> +# We don't care about coverage over fuzzer-specific code, however we should
> +# instrument the fuzzer entry-point so libFuzzer always sees at least some
> +# coverage - otherwise it will exit after the first input
> +src:*/tests/qtest/fuzz/fuzz.c
> +
> +# Enable instrumentation for all functions in those files
> +fun:*
> --
> 2.28.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 20:08 [PATCH-for-6.1 v6] fuzz: add an instrumentation filter Alexander Bulekov
2021-07-13 10:37 ` Darren Kenny [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m28s2av6sw.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=darren.kenny@oracle.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).