From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35143 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGy46-0007Lk-RB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:37:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1OGy45-0002PY-6o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:37:18 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52581)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1OGy44-0002PH-T5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:37:17 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BFBFBCB.2070806@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of
	"Tue, 25 May 2010 11:33:15 -0500")
References: <cover.1274796992.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<9b6575587d22a5c85ec536172810520ee3b945d5.1274796992.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<4BFBE843.5070202@codemonkey.ws> <m34ohwhu3q.fsf@trasno.mitica>
	<4BFBF36D.8070208@codemonkey.ws> <m3k4qsge7y.fsf@trasno.mitica>
	<20100525162549.GQ31759@redhat.com> <4BFBFBCB.2070806@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:43:13 +0200
Message-ID: <m339xgexum.fsf@trasno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] QMP: Introduce MIGRATION events
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 11:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:04:17PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>    
>>> Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:

> I'm not sure why you would need a notification of when migration
> starts (since you know when you've started migration).

But you don't know if the other end "knows" that it has also started.

started is needed only in incoming part, because .... we don't have a
monitor to ask if migration has started.

Later, Juan.