From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43862 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PgKxF-0005Na-Ba for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:39:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKxC-0000TK-Q0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:39:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PgKxC-0000T5-Ft for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:39:18 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi-disk: Allow overriding SCSI INQUIRY removable bit References: <1295345442-16218-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1295345442-16218-2-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D357C0D.5070802@redhat.com> <4D396987.7070903@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:38:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4D396987.7070903@redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:09:59 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Justin M. Forbes" , Christoph Hellwig Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 21.01.2011 11:45, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>>> Am 18.01.2011 11:10, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >>>>> Provide the "removable" qdev property bit to override the SCSI INQUIRY >>>>> removable (RMB) bit for non-CDROM devices. This will be used by USB >>>>> Mass Storage Devices, which sometimes have this guest-visible bit set >>>>> and sometimes do not. They therefore requires a means for user >>>>> configuration. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi >>>> >>>> Should we print an error message when the user tries to make a CD-ROM >>>> non-removable instead of silently ignoring the option? >>> >>> Good point. I will add a check in scsi_disk_initfn() for v3. >> >> Actually this case is hard to check against. The removable property >> is a boolean that defaults to false. We can't detect the difference >> between default, cleared, or set. > > Hm, I see... Maybe we should make scsi-disk and scsi-cdrom different > devices in the long run, Yes. Need to dig out and rebase my patches for it. > then scsi-cdrom could default to true (or > rather not have the property at all). > >> I'm sending out a new version of the patch series that updates >> docs/qdev-device-use.txt to describe how the removable property works. > > Okay, let's just document how it works. > > Kevin