From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeQVD-0005yk-Fh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeQV8-0005sb-JG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:42 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53367 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeQV7-0005sO-Oy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:37 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49781)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1MeQV7-0004Yf-67
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:37 -0400
Received: from int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.19])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7L9XaW5017411
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:36 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A8E68B8.9060206@redhat.com> (Gerd Hoffmann's message of "Fri,
	21 Aug 2009 11:28:24 +0200")
References: <cover.1250788880.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<4A8E61D1.80003@redhat.com> <m3my5twmxd.fsf@neno.mitica>
	<4A8E68B8.9060206@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:31:22 +0200
Message-ID: <m3bpm9wm1h.fsf@neno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/23] New VMState table based load/save
	infrastructure
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/21/09 11:12, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Gerd Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com>  wrote:
>>> Stuffing a pointer to pci_irq_levels into a struct should work without
>>> problems and should be good enougth to get vmstate save/load going ;)
>>>
>>> Sticking the array itself into a struct would be even better, that
>>> might need more cleanup work though.
>>
>> Do you mean to do any of the tow approachs?
>> I promise to study your patch for other places that I need :)
>>
>> Later, Juan.
>
> I can have a look, probably next week though.

I have just saw Markus Watchdog conversion.  Perhaps can get enough
"inspiration" from there to try to do it myself.

Later, Juan.