From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 09/13] TARGET_ARCH2 is already known at configure time and it is called target_cpu Remove re-construction in Makefile.target
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:21:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d48k8dt3.fsf@neno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580907011101n1444dfbaj1288a452f3abd981@mail.gmail.com> (Blue Swirl's message of "Wed\, 1 Jul 2009 21\:01\:29 +0300")
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/09, quintela@redhat.com <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>> From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>>
>
> TARGET_CPU would be a misleading name. TARGET_ARCH2 means that it's a
> kind of subarchitecture. TARGET_SUBARCH or TARGET_ABI32_NAME should be
> OK too.
>
> For example, there is no CPU type (or even class of CPUs) called
> sparc32plus. There is Sparc (a.k.a. Sparc32, V8) and Sparc64 (a.k.a.
> Ultrasparc, V9, V9plusa etc.). Sparc32plus is a userland mode for
> Sparc64 CPUs where the address space is limited to 32 bits. The same
> probably applies to other 32 bit subarchitectures.
I agree, but I just used the same name than in configure:
case "$target_cpu" in
....
sparc32plus)
....
esac.
I don't matter the name, but we have just now:
ARCH
cpu
TARGET_ARCH
TARGET_ARCH2
TARGET_BASE_ARCH
target_cpu
TARGET_ABI_DIR
and I am not sure that I have all of them here. target_cpu and
TARGET_ARCH2 always had the same value, but perhaps changing it to
TARGET_SUBARCH is a good idea. The we would end:
TARGET_BASE_ARCH: architecture name (mips, sparc, ppc)
TARGET_ARCH: Actual architecture
TARGET_SUBARCH: change about TARGET_ARCH (sparc32plus, little/big endian
variants) (was TARGET_ARCH2 and target_cpu)
TARGET_ABI: call ABI for this TARGET_SUBARCH
cpu = canonical name for the cpu, not sure how to relate this one with ARCH
ARCH: where are we building, it is always the same than 'cpu' on
configure, it is only used on the Makefiles, but I would preffer
to only use one name for the same meaning.
kill also cpu in configure script?
Anyone with a good idea?
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 16:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/13] More Build System cleanups quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] fix XEN Build quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/13] fix sparc not solaris build quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/13] Remove duplicated definition quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/13] use block-nested-y for files inside block/ quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/13] use nwfpe-obj-y for consistence quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/13] Remove unused Makefile variable quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] already defined several lines before in block-obj-y quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/13] configure already knows what TARGET_BASE_ARCH we need, no need to put the logic in Makefile.target quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/13] TARGET_ARCH2 is already known at configure time and it is called target_cpu Remove re-construction " quintela
2009-07-01 18:01 ` Blue Swirl
2009-07-01 18:21 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2009-07-01 19:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stuart Brady
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/13] chang ifdefs by obj- quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/13] configure xen in a single place quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/13] configure kvm " quintela
2009-07-01 16:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] configure kqemu " quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3d48k8dt3.fsf@neno.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).