From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWS9i-0003gM-VW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:42:35 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWS9e-0003ex-4e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:42:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54301 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWS9d-0003ep-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:42:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A7166FA.9070401@gnu.org> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu\, 30 Jul 2009 11\:25\:14 +0200") References: <4A7144A6.5060704@gnu.org> <4A7166FA.9070401@gnu.org> From: Juan Quintela Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:40:30 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 30/42] Rename CPPFLAGS to CFLAGS List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paolo Bonzini wrote: > ... agreed, that's why I don't care if you call it CPPFLAGS or > QEMU_CFLAGS or QEMU_CPPFLAGS. I just want to preserve the distinction > between flags the user may want to override (optimization, debugging), > and flags the user should leave alone. Ok, and what are that options? Looking at today Makefiles, the only things that I see that the user could want changing is: -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-unit-at-a-time (ppc) -msmall-data (alpha) -mno-sdata (ia64) Rest of things are -I/-D stuff, that you don't want to touch from the command line at all. Anything else? Should that be enough? Later, Juan.