From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52586 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODwIS-000740-8b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:07:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1ODwIM-00054r-6f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:07:35 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42645)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1ODwIL-00054j-Uo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 05:07:30 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BF0FCEF.3060204@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (Michael Tokarev's message of
	"Mon, 17 May 2010 12:23:11 +0400")
References: <4BE93882.8050105@dlh.net> <m3sk5yxcde.fsf@trasno.mitica>
	<4BEFDEE1.5070906@redhat.com> <m3iq6nc3hr.fsf@trasno.mitica>
	<4BF00592.5040403@redhat.com> <m3eihbbolj.fsf@trasno.mitica>
	<4BF0E988.1040505@redhat.com> <4BF0FCEF.3060204@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:07:22 +0200
Message-ID: <m3r5laaoc5.fsf@trasno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-KVM Livate Migration 0.12.2 -> 0.12.3/4
	broken?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
> 17.05.2010 11:00, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 05/16/2010 11:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> []
>>>> We've regressed from failing some migrations to failing all migrations.
>>> Humm, 0.12.4 -> 0.12.4 should work. My advise is just revert the patch
>>> and live with it for another week, what do you think?
>>
>> A week is fine. I'm not going to release 0.12.4.1 for the week until you
>> fix it, and just changing things in git doesn't help users.
>
> There are at least 1 other problem in the migration code that's
> worth looking at (IMHO anyway): namely, migration on 32 bit host
> is completely (as far as i can see) broken (instant kvm process
> crash) in 0.12, but it works on 64bits:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg34051.html
>
> I wonder why it is not noticed before -- it's broken since 0.12...

People has become rich and everybody has a 64 bit hardware :-)

Will take a look at the end of the week.

Thank for the report, Juan.