From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV1m-0002Qa-7w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:47:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV1k-0008Ur-Va for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:47:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV1k-0008SO-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:47:28 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1312376904-16115-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1312376904-16115-10-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <4E60ADEC.3070903@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:47:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4E60ADEC.3070903@redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:20:28 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/45] ide/atapi: Clean up misleading name in cmd_start_stop_unit() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, amit.shah@redhat.com, hch@lst.de Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 03.08.2011 15:07, schrieb Markus Armbruster: >> "eject" is misleading; it means "eject" when start is clear, but >> "load" when start is set. Rename to loej, because that's how MMC-5 >> calls it, in section 6.40. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- >> hw/ide/atapi.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c >> index fe2fb0b..17fbef8 100644 >> --- a/hw/ide/atapi.c >> +++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c >> @@ -892,11 +892,11 @@ static void cmd_seek(IDEState *s, uint8_t* buf) >> >> static void cmd_start_stop_unit(IDEState *s, uint8_t* buf) >> { >> - int start, eject, sense, err = 0; >> - start = buf[4] & 1; >> - eject = (buf[4] >> 1) & 1; >> + int sense, err = 0; >> + bool start = buf[4] & 1; >> + bool loej = buf[4] & 2; >> >> - if (eject) { >> + if (loej) { >> err = bdrv_eject(s->bs, !start); >> } >> > > "eject" has the advantage that I immediately know that it's something to > do with the tray. "loej" on the other hand is a sequence of four random > characters. Maybe add a comment? The name "loej" comes from MMC-5. I can add a comment to its definition.