From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MaWkG-0005rb-EA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:25:08 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MaWkB-0005iE-AI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:25:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWkB-0005hm-55
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:25:03 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33062)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1MaWkA-0000Cl-P3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:25:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4A8032CD.7030302@codemonkey.ws> (Anthony Liguori's message of
	"Mon\, 10 Aug 2009 09\:46\:37 -0500")
References: <cover.1249301360.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<ac6a44593abcb2f4234f622b2d881bee858e10c3.1249301360.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<4A8032CD.7030302@codemonkey.ws>
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:22:51 +0200
Message-ID: <m3y6profqs.fsf@neno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 81/81] rename aio/CONFIG_AIO to
	posix_aio/CONFIG_POSIX_AIO
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>>   
>
> It's not actually posix-aio, but...
>
> We should just get rid of CONFIG_AIO altogether.  We should always
> enable it.

Ok, about it.  Win people complained that what qemu was missing was
windows aio, not that window's don't have aio.  if it is going
altogether, the better :)

Later, Juan.

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori