From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O1XLj-0007Tu-Fi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:03:43 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49583 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O1XLh-0007RY-DD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:03:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <junkoi2004@gmail.com>) id 1O1XLf-0003K0-JY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:03:41 -0400
Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:39870)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <junkoi2004@gmail.com>) id 1O1XLf-0003Jt-BJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:03:39 -0400
Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so4814204pwi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:03:18 +0900
Message-ID: <n2gfdaac4d51004122103vdf11929el71f537e6a1f6803@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Missing singlestep for already-translated code?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

I am looking into the singlestep command in monitor interface, and it
seems that we only take into account the singlestep flag when we are
translating code.
So for the already-translated code, we will miss singlestep?

Thanks,
Jun