From: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Li Qiang" <liq3ea@gmail.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alexander Bulekov" <alxndr@bu.edu>,
Ruhr-University <bugs-syssec@rub.de>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: check bus pointer before dereference
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:57:45 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YSQ.7.78.906.2009161152040.10832@xnncv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0859f8a-1224-66d0-7e32-091caa5cfcbe@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1528 bytes --]
+-- On Tue, 15 Sep 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote --+
| > I think in normal this 'bus' will be not NULL. I have look at the link in
| > the commit msg. I find it is another DMA to MMIO issue which we have
| > discussed a lot but didn't come up with an satisfying solution.
If 'bus' is unlikely to be NULL, should this be a regular non-CVE bug?
| As usual, question is how we got here.
| As Li said, it is another DMA to MMIO bug class.
|
| lsi_execute_script
| -> address_space_write
| -> acpi_pcihp_eject_slot
| -> bus_remove_child
|
| So at this point the PCI device is still MMIO-mapped but eject from the
| bus... ??? Then IRQ is triggered, which the device wants to propagate via
| its PCI bus but it doesn't have any more and b00m.
|
| If a device is hotpluggable, who is responsible to unmap its regions?
Not sure, I guess I'll leave it for the upstream maintainers to device a
better solution.
| Nack, this should be an abort().
===
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index de0fae10ab..0ccb991410 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static void pci_change_irq_level(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int
irq_num, int change)
PCIBus *bus;
for (;;) {
bus = pci_get_bus(pci_dev);
+ assert(bus);
irq_num = bus->map_irq(pci_dev, irq_num);
if (bus->set_irq)
break;
===
This should be okay for now?
Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
8685 545E B54C 486B C6EB 271E E285 8B5A F050 DE8D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 11:49 [PATCH] pci: check bus pointer before dereference P J P
2020-09-15 12:46 ` P J P
2020-09-15 13:51 ` Li Qiang
2020-09-15 16:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 6:27 ` P J P [this message]
2020-09-16 12:19 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-28 11:03 ` P J P
2020-09-30 5:02 ` P J P
2020-09-30 6:45 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-09-30 10:14 ` P J P
2020-10-30 9:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-30 10:50 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.YSQ.7.78.906.2009161152040.10832@xnncv \
--to=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=alxndr@bu.edu \
--cc=bugs-syssec@rub.de \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=liq3ea@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).