From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNDZ-00036O-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:53:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNDU-0002Zy-4H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:53:41 -0500 Received: from static.88-198-71-155.clients.your-server.de ([88.198.71.155]:39584 helo=socrates.bennee.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNDT-0002Zj-Sw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:53:36 -0500 References: <1383786324-18415-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1383786324-18415-62-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <1383786324-18415-62-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:53:33 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.8 61/61] target-i386: Deconstruct thecpu_T arrayy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org rth@twiddle.net writes: > All references to cpu_T are done with a constant index. It aids > readability to decompose the array into two scalar variables. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the readability argument but does this make any difference to the eventual code generated? -- Alex Bennée