From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNxv-0000s0-UA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:34:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNxu-0000rn-FL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:33:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNxu-0000rk-Dg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:33:58 -0400 Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BrNuM-0004gt-Jm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:30:18 -0400 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BrNuL-00027T-00 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:30:17 +0200 Received: from amarseille-206-1-24-10.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr ([81.51.158.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:30:17 +0200 Received: from daimon55 by amarseille-206-1-24-10.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:30:17 +0200 From: Ronald Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <76bfb9d2040801091719aafb43@mail.gmail.com> <410D5D8D.4020102@blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? Reply-To: daimon55@free.fr, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:15:57 +0100, Ross Kendall Axe a écrit : > > Ronald wrote: > | Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a écrit : > | > | > | The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat with > | an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs. > > 2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is using a > 'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed anyway > really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions. > I think that the 2Gb limitation is true only with linux vfat drivers and win can write files =< 4Gb on fat32. This is what is said here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/default.asp?url=/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/choosing_between_NTFS_FAT_and_FAT32.asp