From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH5NS-000557-RX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:58:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CH5NS-00054j-6H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:58:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH5NS-00054e-1n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:58:34 -0400 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CH5GN-0006dT-Br for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:51:15 -0400 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CH5GM-0004oO-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:51:14 +0200 Received: from amarseille-206-1-28-73.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr ([81.53.204.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:51:14 +0200 Received: from daimon55 by amarseille-206-1-28-73.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:51:14 +0200 From: Ronald Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:51:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2ad73a041011105226e69892@mail.gmail.com> <2ad73a04101111341e9c93c8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: [BROKEN] Windows host: -redir flag, console output, -nographic Reply-To: daimon55@free.fr, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Le Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:34:35 -0300, André Braga a écrit : > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:10:59 +0200, Ronald wrote: >> I don't use cygwin, sorry if it seems a dumb question. Are you launching >> X11 server before qemu? If tcp/6000 is already bound on host side, could >> this prevent qemu to start? > > Now I'm feeling stupid ;D > > Sorry. Still, the console and -nographic are broken as described. If QEMU > ever attempted to tell me that the port was in use, I never got the > message... > For stdout I think the only way is to redirect output to a file, I know this work for text output like help(perhaps it depends on SDL redirection support). Windows has a something particular, a gui application don't have a console with stdio attached by default, I remember there was a patch to implement console support, kazu's qemu for windows used it. > > Cheers, > A.