From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Czqmg-0004FA-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:29:42 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzqmU-00047H-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:29:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzqmR-00046J-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:29:23 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzqRR-00046f-Sl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:07:42 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CzqPR-00013w-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:05:37 +0100 Received: from 203.7.227.188 ([203.7.227.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:05:37 +0100 Received: from wildfire by 203.7.227.188 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:05:37 +0100 From: Anand Kumria Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:14:58 +1100 Message-ID: References: <420BEEB7.1010906@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: The QEMU Accelerator Module Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:01:53 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Anand Kumria wrote: > >> Is it really fair to distribute a proprietary module from a free >> software source code repository? > > Is it really fair to expect others to work for nothing at all? > Are you actually this stupid? Or is it that English isn't you native language and you've missed the subtle point that qemu is breaking the rules of savannah by distributing a binary module? I was trying to be polite and subtle about it so that Fabrice could consider his options and make a considered cautious move. Anyway, because of your response, I've complained to the savannah administrators. No thanks to you. Anand