From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O42Ze-0001we-8q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:48:26 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48600 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O42Zc-0001wU-3o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:48:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gabriel.southern@gmail.com>) id 1O42Za-0002uw-3x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:48:23 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:33577)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gabriel.southern@gmail.com>) id 1O42Za-0002up-13
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:48:22 -0400
Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5so2871774gyd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580911081128wcf8ae17v2a83bf5ffe82dddf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1423348936.2513841257534586216.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu>
	<296914565.2513861257534600624.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu>
	<f43fc5580911081128wcf8ae17v2a83bf5ffe82dddf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:48:20 -0700
Message-ID: <q2v3c2bf46d1004191848ud4171187m24cbec1c2b6ee03c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SPARC user mode multithread
From: Gabriel Southern <gabriel.southern@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

I noticed that this patch never got applied, but I'm not sure if it
works.  It seems like it works for forks, but not for pthreads.  I
tried applying it to the current git head and it seems to change the
behavior from dumping the registers to dying silently for code with
pthreads, but does work with forks (at least for a very simple test
program without shared memory).

-Gabriel

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:10 PM, David Munday <cromom@soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Sorry forgot attachment! I have attached it to this email now. I also noticed that the last line should assign the pid to the child, but I didn't see where I can find that info and pass it into the cpu_clone_regs function.
>
> Could you test if this patch helps?
>