From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O2bcq-0001Uy-Hl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:49:48 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43398 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2bcp-0001Uq-CB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:49:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <junkoi2004@gmail.com>) id 1O2bco-0007pz-Hr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:49:47 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f198.google.com ([209.85.211.198]:47337)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <junkoi2004@gmail.com>) id 1O2bco-0007pp-Ep
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:49:46 -0400
Received: by ywh36 with SMTP id 36so1039020ywh.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:49:24 +0900
Message-ID: <t2hfdaac4d51004151949i834ca829z8c1cf78ed4457463@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [Qemu-devel] TLB entry with separate addr_{read|write|code}?
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

In the TLB entry, why do we need to maintain separately addr_read,
addr_write and addr_code? Is it impossible to have only one for all
the purposes?

As far as I can see in tlb_set_page(), these fields are mutually
exclusive, as they either enable or get invalid value (-1).

Thanks,
Jun