From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O4vdB-0003CP-Tb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:35:46 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45298 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4vdA-0003Ad-BX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:35:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com>) id 1O4vd7-00013m-SB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:35:44 -0400
Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:37384)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com>) id 1O4vd7-00013f-PZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:35:41 -0400
Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so152046gwb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tamura.yoshiaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4BD034B9.3070006@oss.ntt.co.jp>
References: <1271829445-5328-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<4BD00FBA.5040604@redhat.com> <4BD02684.8060202@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<4BD034B9.3070006@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:35:39 +0900
Message-ID: <w2z87e9effc1004220535z83046a45t7761622ef8b0d0fe@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Kemari for KVM v0.1
From: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com

2010/4/22 Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>:
> (2010/04/22 19:35), Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>
>>
>>> A trivial one would we to :
>>> - do X online snapshots/sec
>>
>> I currently don't have good numbers that I can share right now.
>> Snapshots/sec depends on what kind of workload is running, and if the
>> guest was almost idle, there will be no snapshots in 5sec. On the other
>> hand, if the guest was running I/O intensive workloads (netperf, iozone
>> for example), there will be about 50 snapshots/sec.
>>
>
> 50 is too small: this depends on the synchronization speed and does not
> show how many snapshots we need, right?

No it doesn't.
It's an example data which I measured before.