From: WX Chen <wxchen0913@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza <daniel.barboza@oss.qualcomm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Chao Liu" <chao.liu.zevorn@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
"Weiwei Li" <liwei1518@gmail.com>,
"Liu Zhiwei" <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, "Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] tests/qtest: add K230 UART test
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:53:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c201c673-eee6-474b-ace2-03f36d004858@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af3d837c-e7f2-48ce-9b9c-c2ea9e4d8fb8@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the review!
On 8/6/26 04:10, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
> Any reason to use g_usleep() instead of qtest_clock_step()? There are
> a couple
> of g_usleep() uses in the code but you used lots of qtest_clock_step()
> too.
>
> AFAIK g_usleep() is wall time and qtest_clock_step() is simulated
> time, and
> I guess you should be using qtest_clock_step() for all the pollings
> you're
> doing in this file.
>
You're right, there's no reason to mix them here. I'll fix this in v3.
Regards,
WX Chen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 3:52 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] riscv: Add K230 DW 8250-compatible UART WX Chen
2026-07-25 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/3] hw/char: add " WX Chen
2026-08-05 20:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-08-07 9:49 ` zhenbaii
2026-07-25 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/3] hw/riscv: k230: connect DW 8250 UART WX Chen
2026-08-05 20:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-07-25 3:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] tests/qtest: add K230 UART test WX Chen
2026-08-05 20:10 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-08-07 11:53 ` WX Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c201c673-eee6-474b-ace2-03f36d004858@gmail.com \
--to=wxchen0913@gmail.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=chao.liu.zevorn@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.barboza@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox