From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1tcQGq-0000cH-1m for mharc-qemu-rust@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:39:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tcJ6l-0006PX-9u for qemu-rust@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:00:33 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tcJ6j-0001PF-4E for qemu-rust@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:00:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737961215; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EEbV97eP8ZFhORQPRZempXA+n4EZg5LmPyKk2VFjw0E=; b=BPqUPVp85+xfbhOikvfqzm3LS90oSBvouT0vuzwLpyLf9AZXw/FqaTqOYlSG6qdp+EgVzK Cq73dQX4sTlx4mtAfQxqgcc0jCm5BfOqrpOfF3A6MXhn9+zMfFUqh/YzyR8jESZ48u0B04 1yboMsJlRTQtO8YBez9hOM3AqlAkpJg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-149-ZXmFDnk_P6O2gNaG7Z0WSA-1; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:00:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ZXmFDnk_P6O2gNaG7Z0WSA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: ZXmFDnk_P6O2gNaG7Z0WSA Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1120718009A8; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 07:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.48]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF5F1800348; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 07:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0890E21E6A28; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:00:07 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= , qemu-rust@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost , Manos Pitsidianakis , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] qom: Introduce class_post_init() handler In-Reply-To: <20250125165855.32168-3-philmd@linaro.org> ("Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Sat, 25 Jan 2025 17:58:55 +0100") References: <20250125165855.32168-1-philmd@linaro.org> <20250125165855.32168-3-philmd@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 08:00:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87wmegoi6g.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.299, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:39:16 -0500 X-BeenThere: qemu-rust@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: QEMU Rust-related patches and discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 07:00:38 -0000 Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: > Add a class_post_init() handler to be called by parents > *after* child class_init() handler is called. This is > necessary to have parent class check children properly > set some values or mandatory handlers. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 Plausible, but I'd like to see actual use. What uses do you have in mind?