From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC27BCA0EE8 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uylbG-0007Lp-2J; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:25:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uylb0-0007IX-Ev; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:24:53 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.19]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uylai-0007Bz-2w; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:24:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758090272; x=1789626272; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=RGmMowDRCbSSZDE+Jt7DwfGm1bZzQY5qksrq9moMJxA=; b=d2Kqc6RzQqC7eTgIpiXWzJlXxk7zp2Vqe5kFF+ndnGGwsAnGLveiLwYX t+31j4n4Lue+K1iYDIc6ZNrl80JmpzLR7QR97pqFz1927aWaeEkh41A00 egG4k983ypx8gCNHnaJfDAdWLDUGi8yv2gfhCBLSpBJI9ntNo+x9uO53Y T9j0ubP1nPuTy9WMBuoUCEPr9ghVtQxkqw+W8L7HBKONuJeJWK150cwH6 jeuW8hQu1YoP6qHIaFPKS2YosXGHX/mcmUqsBv1aXL6PxGdIvYZ4DFwn1 m2Ji5YarLP3kNfeUsHt9uQKX4jgJV+oloVR7iGKeFrIG01vWYT2T8X26L w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LH6QT3zAQRa1AfmXjl73CQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sIcBcnC9RnSVal7tsasBJA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11555"; a="59430655" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,271,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="59430655" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2025 23:24:28 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7AW4v/EDRnarBfA2xyXR8g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RzL7vxUrTHWZ5VqCZ0H1Uw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,271,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="175068190" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2025 23:24:27 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:46:21 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Manos Pitsidianakis Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-rust@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] rust/qdev: Rename PropertyInfo field from VALUE to BASE_INFO Message-ID: References: <20250916085557.2008344-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20250916085557.2008344-8-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.19; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.009, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-rust@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: QEMU Rust-related patches and discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-rust-bounces+qemu-rust=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-rust-bounces+qemu-rust=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 01:10:39PM +0300, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:10:39 +0300 > From: Manos Pitsidianakis > Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] rust/qdev: Rename PropertyInfo field from VALUE > to BASE_INFO > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 11:34 AM Zhao Liu wrote: > > > > Bit property info will added next. To distinguish different info fields, > > rename `VALUE` to `BASE_INFO`, then it can better reflect that it > > represents the basic property info. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Manos Pitsidianakis Thanks! > You can squash this patch to the bit info one Yes, after patch 8, renaming doesn't need to change too many places. Regards, Zhao