[Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] pci: fix some typos

[Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] pci: fix some typos

[Cao jin]

Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +-
 hw/vfio/pci.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
index 99cfb45..39b10b8 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void pcie_ext_cap_set_next(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t pos, uint16_t next)
 }
 
 /*
- * caller must supply valid (offset, size) * such that the range shouldn't
+ * Caller must supply valid (offset, size) such that the range wouldn't
  * overlap with other capability or other registers.
  * This function doesn't check it.
  */
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 31aaecb..c94987c 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
      * 0 is reserved for this since absence of capabilities is indicated by
      * 0 for the ID, version, AND next pointer.  However, pcie_add_capability()
      * uses ID 0 as reserved for list management and will incorrectly match and
-     * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with with this
-     * ID.  Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
+     * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with this ID.
+     * Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
      * part for identifying absence of capabilities in a root complex register
      * block.  If the ID still exists after adding capabilities, switch back to
      * zero.  We'll mark this entire first dword as emulated for this purpose.
-- 
2.1.0

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] pci: fix some typos

[Alex Williamson]

On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:37:58 +0800
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +-
>  hw/vfio/pci.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Send separate patches.  Thanks,

Alex

> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> index 99cfb45..39b10b8 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void pcie_ext_cap_set_next(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t pos, uint16_t next)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * caller must supply valid (offset, size) * such that the range shouldn't
> + * Caller must supply valid (offset, size) such that the range wouldn't
>   * overlap with other capability or other registers.
>   * This function doesn't check it.
>   */
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 31aaecb..c94987c 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
>       * 0 is reserved for this since absence of capabilities is indicated by
>       * 0 for the ID, version, AND next pointer.  However, pcie_add_capability()
>       * uses ID 0 as reserved for list management and will incorrectly match and
> -     * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with with this
> -     * ID.  Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
> +     * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with this ID.
> +     * Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
>       * part for identifying absence of capabilities in a root complex register
>       * block.  If the ID still exists after adding capabilities, switch back to
>       * zero.  We'll mark this entire first dword as emulated for this purpose.